What Do Rubber Bands On Wrists Mean

"Certification or Location? Interestingly


This post is a personal addition to the theme and discussion began in the blog Oscar Gonzalez Loyo.
In recent years the relationship has been discussed Comic-webcomic, between us and some other players in that area. The discussion since then has been a reality if the webcomics are bad (or demonized as we want to foist) or so craft to be produced by any person, that is a line that has diverted attention away from the true meaning of our skepticism about the actual usefulness and profitability compared to the comics webcomics. Experience K!
, editorially speaking, from the beginning has made us fight to restore optimum labor, economic and artistic decline by half in bad attitudes and handling of a guild editorial. When launched Saskunah cibercómic of the Maya in 95-96 , the conditions for the development of this material were still poor but enthusiastic, the project was in "stan by " by these conditions and gave the biggest boost to our primary objectives in the original areas: seeking investment for the production and publication of comic book titles a cult comic and widely accepted as Karmatron , always tip lance, and the search and desire to shape animation teams in second and medium term.

From some years now, once the dust accent many failings of Internet connections and the development of new technologies, webcomics gained new impetus as a space for creation. If it is true that anyone can make a webcomic in their own way, our view has always been to maintain a minimum quality to offer the public and respect for him. The real crux of the matter is centered on the argument that webcomics and / or its creators for the simple fact exist and have an answer (that is, small, medium or large) with an audience on the Internet, were a source of reference to equal representation and management values \u200b\u200bthe traditional printed comics.

Some webcomiqueros or supporters, with no or short-lived attempts to publish on paper, underestimated the experience and learned parameters and repeated mainly by Oscar González Loyo and some of us as well many other artists and industry professionals and the international scene, citing the freedom of the new medium. Freedom that inevitably becomes licentiousness and quality expectations of taste, still individuals and not companies or professional communities , they're not subject to any commitment outside the fenced and centralized view of themselves.

K! always fought and argued about the need to revive an industry real, not virtual , producing marketable items and objects and collectibles for the benefit of a union and consumer groups to collect, preserve implementation models tested and reliable, they do not fall in or vulgarity the "vulgar", involving an aesthetic quality and professional content, supervised, as in all businesses and industries, career experts and experienced enough to give a minimum of presentation and sales expectations in the market.

Beyond commercial K! has always sought to strengthen the image, skills and professional ethics or aspiring cartoonists who come to us not only to eradicate the production and discipline services, but to give more and better weapons to a guild so exploited and despised in years earlier and now cornered with the loss of production facilities and places for their trade.

What is the main value that anyone can do webcomics?: freedom of creation and expression.
What is your problem?: The degeneration of the quality and content and the imposition on the public misperception of what a comic should be professional, not the actual existence of the webcomic, but self-deception that some webcomiqueros living, thinking, stirring, looking down and diluting the theme and importance of the issue of the comic industry, his vices and problems which we focus has always been and comparing them, equating them or rejecting them in favor of providing importance and benefits to a medium that has little to do with the plight suffered by his older brother and the only help (value) in the field of advertising and promotion, somewhat in the creation, but little in the taking of means for the revival of industry, insist, real not virtual.

cultural
As a means of expression might be fine freedom granted by the internet, but not to equate the conditions and rules and wrongly mixed with the needs, problems and conditions of the publishing industry as it has in the past years, not only silly, it seems to me criminal because it creates confusion and undermines primary message, the scene in which we find ourselves today. Even more so when, as now, was murdered early in favor of "the new wave of technology" without the slightest benefit of the doubt.

That many creative or would have found a haven on the Internet with their indifference to an ethic of quality, lack of rules for "publishing" and an extremely easy to "speak" on the internet, is a mirage, an easy exit justify the mediocrity of not accepting a guide or artistic direction, not certification. Illusion that in many cases, they believed, automatically converts artists, skipping default discipline, quality background and experience, respect for the creators of an industry should be much better appreciated and considered. No one hates

, denigrates, or belittles the webcomics per se , as desired blamed. Although we disagree with the ideologies of some, we always mention and praise the quality of talented artists and professionals. Webcomics excellent and well made as the bulb, Kimeko, Micro, Betteo Invisible Worlds and other national and foreign who are swarming on the web are good comics that deserve to be considered by the public and even paid a fair and reasonable .

The web has great potential as a means of disseminating a message, however, the print medium still remains so lost in the din of those for accountability, knowledge generation or adolescent contempt, avoid confronting the horror that they represent the paper, drawing board and unrelenting trial aesthetics. We simply advocate for product quality and the artist, referring to one, if not the largest of the laws of the Internet, conveniently I have not heard mentioned: "On the web, content is king."

But many environmental confuse free with "success" and acceptance. Today, the statistics are taken as reference for this success, but before when we were mentioning the comparative sales of comics, they are despised, emulating the "success" of publications on other factors. In this case, where we measure the "success"? Is it adaptable to mobible or convenience?

So why "belittling" to an author who gets a certain age and lives of your webcomic? Some might say. But it is not the case.

If someone can live a webcomic (but do not know in what conditions), can be an invaluable experience and demonstrate the sympathy of a particular sector. At issue is the oysters in mediocrity to say "I know you do not draw", then what quality is being giving the public? Is freedom of speech proper justification for artistic mediocrity? Is the bad taste of a certain age a reference point to give value to a position not experienced but intended to impose as "opinion leaders" to discuss issues and problems of a real industry and confused, underestimated and / or reworded to virtual, as has become customary in recent years? Is it permissible or desirable to give kitsch and vulgar the domain of the circumstances?

The webcomic has become the refuge or the equivalent of what previously were the fanzine , magazines or publications fledgling, home, usually with little or no quality graphics and storyline and often copies of other comics and manga, or based on the wording of promotional items from their fanaticism for the comic or science fiction made "for art's sake" and under impetuous need to express themselves as artists, fans and specialists in a particular subject. But is it art or culture? Culture might be if, for better or for worse, since all forms of behavior, "customary" knowledge products and certain social group they are. But culture, in the sense of a bulwark, bequests and aesthetic development and knowledge desirable not think so.

And on that basis "cultural" lame and poor is that it has built an argument for a free demonstration, but at the expense of the need for professionalism. A look obsessed and inexperienced, a truncated and aesthetically inferior quality, a vision denied to understand and retrograde and self-indulgent attitude are the ingredients of the broth in which they are converting many webcomics, for their ability to exist and the awkward habit of some authors to equate the problem, quality, insight and transcendence of traditional comics.

Is criticizing webcomics? No, he criticizes the authors of them when used as an outlet for their mediocrity and traumas shape internal. Should they cease to exist? Either, but would welcome a greater commitment to them. Does this mean uniciar a crusade to destroy the bad disappear and webcomics? Impossible and unnecessary. The so-called "quality filters" work always, the public accepts or rejects what he likes. It is not enough, it is desirable and necessary and visual cultural education required to raise the level of what is presented or at least the wit to make it mildly entertaining. Does this mean that the traditional comic all was, or is, aesthetics and arguably correct? ...

Of course not, precisely the degeneration of the property and work experience quality were part of what consumed the industry and its artists more confident. But there was an established industry with room for all types of products and to "experiment" that has been lost and what we observe is that the generational bump I think this problem is rocking from the start that degradation in the environment webcomiquero art Mexican. Of concern, on the other hand see it as exaggeration and egotism saying or pretending in our person or of anyone who questions the move: "Who are you to certify?".

Our real cross generation remains firm in our everyday world, and now, thanks to standardization, media placement and appearance of objective and sustainable technologies, we also rely on the web as an important means of promotion. This, to maintain an effective complicated by the circumstances of the outside world, which observed a majority of the members of this virtual environment has conveniently avoided settling into a comfortable niche and provides a stable psychological wellbeing and in some rare cases, economic, but not actually adding any weight to an industry on which many things unknown but believe to understand.

The Internet user has been married to the idea that "everything should be free" and immediately, but the real world in which we live, does not operate well. It is necessary to professionalize an artist, so is public education when the value of the product, is a very hard and some believe that impossible but must be done. Those wishing to express themselves and have it only as a hobby or even those who wait "one day live in it," know perfectly well that the lack or establishment of a "business model" is necessarily linked to that perception.

I think the only way to reverse this ideology gradually, is also of superior quality to always insist on the point about the courage and dedication of the artist to produce that product quality, as though the audience spends time consuming, also wears the artist and spends much time in making it and deserves a minimum wage for their work, especially if you are worried about it in optimal quality. There is nothing mandatory, because on the web, many things are informal and ephemeral, but I think morally it is a mutual debt, fair and honorable among the creative and audience.

is gratifying and impressive when a player like your professional work and dedication perceived it, primarily if a fault-free internal know when you have not achieved the level that the reader deserves, or worse, on the simple pitiful cronyism or pimp. Oscar

As mentioned, poor quality can lead to confusion in novice or untrained sectors of the pubic, distorting the taste and the perception of individuals. As he mentioned, a clear example soap operas or certain styles of music. What can you do? Find ethically and morally beyond the procedural defects of taste or plan dedicated to exalt those who are themselves working to improve not only our capacity for perception, wonder and personal expression, but to rescue assessment values \u200b\u200band behavior that contribute to and help to improve a community and not just a selfish and individualistic self-indulgence or convenience. But as they say, that's evolution and ticket everyone.

And while there are creative people who say: "I would like to improve my drawing, inking or narrative" and have the opportunity to do so if they try really, I see the potential reached by the likes of Mariana Moreno and I keep asking and saddened by what these newcomers have achieved over the years who have been "active" and without significant progress, if you like her, belittled and would not allowed to have a proper art direction, and freed from the ego, the grid, "sound fun "and bad guidance and example that swarms both in certain network environments," they sing a different story. "
Anyone can read free
XKCD, for example, which of course is aimed at an audience geek, which is mostly online, and content we will be entertaining and witty, yet always be this bad taste in mouth: "I wish I were well-drawn" . Consumers may spend time in a free product with low or medium quality, but how in the days to come will be willing to spend money on those products having their dispocición other much better? Because it is true that at this moment sees a new beginning or an alternative, but this is what will count is the quality competition. Anyone

can make a webcomic and seek to satisfy their need of expression, acceptance and complacency "artistic", but what you must do if it lacks quality, useful content and message and / or aesthetic? What do you say your conscience? Does it deserve respect for the public and "medium" or have to settle for what they consume forzozamente "any" place without mentioning the amount of waste generated visual? Is it unfair to argue for a professionalization of creative fulfillment?

Many will say out of spite that then we would fall into several of these items, but deep down they know that we have always sought to produce not just entertainment comics and graphic quality but contain a message, criticism or complaint that transcend a change of consciousness or resolution of certain issues, especially in our middle and Indurium, but also as a social issue. It is pure idealism and hard in many ways, but would say Milton Glaser: "The idealism is also eaten."

"Death safer? Small chance of success? What are we waiting for!" - Gimli

______
Finally, I make public a controversy raised recently on Twitter, a social network of choice for many supporters not K! and the highest number of attacks and ridicule it genera hacia nuestro Estudio.


Precisamente, en relación a la postura de Maritza Campos ("mcamposr" en Twitter) por hacer público en dicho sitio su intención de replicar a Oscar González Loyo, los argumentos y comentarios realizados en diversos escritos y que la relacionan a ella y su trabajo, surgieron diversos comentarios al respecto. Uno de ellos proveniente de Luis Gantus, personaje que ya hemos mencionado en muchas ocasiones, así como sus cuestionables métodos, actitudes y actuaciones.

Lo que reproduzco a continuación fue una serie de mensajes o "twitts" intercambiados por mí y Norihiko Matsumoto con Gantus en relación a sus dichos y peticiones para con Maritza y la situación referenced above and described by the aforementioned as "gossip." These comments and messages are public and anyone wishing to check the veracity can consult the aforementioned accounts. Due to the rapid and immediate nature so this network is involuntary and natural a lot of spelling mistakes, but it really does not diminish the meaning of messages.

The intent of this play, not how to say "do gossip, but to lay in the historical memory, we generated outrage to me and other kabunes and friends, those messages and how they chided the individual by demonstrating the baseness of those methods and manipulations. For this type of situation is that Oscar and other acquaintances they have in so little esteem as Scar in The Lion King.

My username on Twitter is "Blaster2501" and the message order is chronological


Luis Gantus: @ mcamposr ask him why his dad had to denounce reb to protect it

EJEA Tonatiuh Rocha: @ gantusluis And why you call your dad and ask him directly? Tell her the way you respect as mired in gossip by Twitter
This inter-
, Oscar knew about the "question" of Luis and said in his blog:
"By the way tell Gantus that you asked me questions about my father and Ejea, is the quantum answer on Tuesday. "-

Luis Gantus: @ mcamposr mmmh for now I already know what happened and I do not care about their version, surely will be one of his many lies

Luis Gantus: @ mcamposr already know what version of EJEA, and I'm going to throw eight hours of listening to their boring hate

program "This was the point really shocked me, because we know well the story told by the mouth of Don Oscar Gonzalez Guerrero, know that the "version" of both father and son is just the same. Pretender his dad used to smear Oscar son is an injustice that I find reprehensible and yet nothing new because long ago, some remember him as Mr. Gantus, referred to John Byrne, the famous and controversial author of mockery and insult comics in the form of expressions implicitly equate the figure of "an author eighties and problematic."

So I called Don Oscar for comment and sent through me a couple of messages to Luis, but in the absence of direct response to my original question I sent "the message" Luis and also to the already Maritza involved to ensure "delivery"

Tonatiuh: @ mcamposr as you are so thoughtful to send this message please give a @ gantusluis because it avoids answering my tweets:
"says father Oscar" his version "is the same as his son, he lived if he wants to do it gone directly liar .. .
@ gantusluis also says the grocer no longer gossip laundry and if you just lost your request.

-A Gantus what Louis said,

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501no have received one of my blissful "tweets", Al's dad Oscar I have a deep respect and that the SI is a storyteller

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 NEVER and clarified, NEVER called him a liar, Don Oscar, unlike his son who keeps inventing nonsense

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 and not worry about walking as a messenger, right now I speak to Don Oscar and clarified
this
Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 fixed the little matter and see if you stop and say correve walk to fool

----

Tonatiuh Rocha: @ gantusluis Good thing because I have been clear of all forms are going to talk about it on Tuesday, the "recadeo" it .. I started your

Tonatiuh: @ gantusluis And hopefully meet the promise you made to Don Oscar and stop talking without walking on K! bases way you used # SIPAS

Norihiko: @ gantusluis then why have you been causing?, first litter of "go and ask" instead of going the same and then you complain, do not post if

----

Luis Gantus: Enough bullshit and cats that just invent gossip, MARITZA all my support, my respect Oscar Gonzalez Guerrero, and ..... -> (More)
that OGL continue with their "ideas, not share them, nor do I care, I fucked up so much filth and gossip their cats cheap d, X q I want to say what

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 and certainly Oscar also has my phone, to use them if you want to say something and do not send their cats

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 if you do what I say, I also maintain my sayings, not I speak without basis and whenever Oscar I repeat the same thing in your face


Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 if Oscar has something to fix me to stop sucking and send their cats and tell me what MI, my phone has

Luis Gantus: @ Nori_Matsumoto NO I will continue talking to sectarian stupefied, My issue is with Oscar and point, I am here to what is offered

Luis Gantus: Oscar reported that Don asked me were to stop and the anger that made no sense to accept and which I asked if Oscar had .... (More)

Luis Gantus: .... tell me about any problems like I did with him. I hope that OGL has the courage to speak as I did with his father

Norihiko: @ gantusluis but if you were the first to send a @ mcamposr to provoke, but good that you said you're not going to say anything


Luis Gantus: @ Nori_Matsumoto I'm going to explain to apples to see if you understand: I DO NOT WANT TO TALK WITH CATS lackeys.


Luis Gantus: @ Wyliman Don Oscar I talk very nice to me, I'm sad this is happening and expected to end soon, for my part I keep it that


Luis Gantus: @ MJnyo Since Don Oscar know we have always had a great relationship, which I can not tell your child, you say la vie Ces't

Luis Gantus: @ Blaster2501 and I hope that Oscar is equivalent to when you want to say something, talk on the phone and everyone is happy


Norihiko: @ gantusluis Just look how many rude, you could simply not answer, but good



----

After the obvious obfuscation, Luis Gantus decided to reject any new message from us through the blockade of our accounts to your "Timeline" and continued discussing the matter with various people: Luis Gantus

: technical question when block someone on twitter, what happens? this guy keeps appearing in my TL and my Mentions?


Luis Gantus: @ Wyliman je nomas imagine that eventually told me that my mom reminded him that he owed a great guy hehe coffee Don Luis Oscar

Gantus: @ Wyliman I said that me and respect for him, and he was going to stop now to see if those understand,

Luis Gantus: @ Gaby_Maya and stayed at the best of terms, Oscar is a great guy ----



As a right of reply and not having had the opportunity to answer in real time, I wrote the last message to Luis Gantus regardless of whether the receive, answer or not, my intention was to let úlltimos accented several points:

Tonatiuh: @ gantusluis Do not want to talk with "cats" because it turns out that SI act and think for themselves? # Peronoteconviene do so ...

Tonatiuh: @ gantusluis If "cat" face and question your bluff best # agarromiscanicasymevoy


Tonatiuh: @ gantusluis "respect" Maritza but try to "cat" to send recaditos, Why do not you talked to directly and now you say Oscar?

Tonatiuh: @ gantusluis If you hold what you say and not speak without K! bases, show me you're a cult (Oscar's parents included)


Tonatiuh Rocha: @ gantusluis Historical Memory: Oscar you said in your face so you do not like many times, I've been there and what it will say "No?


Tonatiuh: @ Gantusluis "Informa" what you want or your convenience, we and Oscar G. Guerrero will do the same, you'd had the courage to speak ...
with Dad muddy Oscar before with "the truth that you knew that you told a girl" # menosmalqueinvestigas


Tonatiuh: @ Oscar gantusluis If you attack or you get your dad, you do it all K!, as Don told you that so you know ...
and it is perfectly clear, the historical memory of K! / The much-mocked) begins with Don Oscar, then OGL ...

and then Susy, Hoacho, Alex, Mariana ... and the rest "that nobody knows" if you want to stop you perfect, but I had to say ...
... # ohqueyaniesopuedo latter? The ball is in your court, it's your decision, I say, if so I respect ... # Hastanunca

When posting this I have not received any reply from Luis Gantus on Twitter, but probably realize after seeing this post.

see, are my own initiative and words that are reflected in contrast to how many people say or think, or handling alcahueteo Oscar "which commands us to say things, this has never been, despite the extremely Nearby are our ways of thinking here in K! each person says what he thinks and does what he thinks fit and just, which does not mean that we concencen certain decisions as a group. And by the way, Oscar was not even in the study when they started these events.

Luis made a serious mistake to try to involve Don Oscar in words to his son, and I want to emphasize again that the reason for this letter is to publicize the event and demonstrate how they are manipulated, misinterpreted or ignored certain situations with the aim of perdudicar the name of Oscar, that of Ka-Boom! or its members, a situation that neither I nor anyone else is willing to allow.

According to Luis, was on very good terms with Don Oscar, or so he thought, but we will complete this saying in our radio program Tuesday, April 20. With this type of situation as anyone feels free to judge for ego or convenience which does not even know, for example the case of seeing, treating and get to say we are a religious sect or that we reproduce "after incest "(sic).

The fact that we share ideologies and beliefs and that create a more harmonious coexistence in the study does not in any way that we are fanatical as people seek ritualistic or crossed out. In fact we are the first to be against extremely fanatical practices, but that's another story.

And these last two messages are another situation that remains also Twitter:

Luis Sopelana: Could it be that many authors resort to cronyism Cronyism and because there were "professionals" by the Nepotism?

Tonatiuh Rocha: @ sopelana Want to explain that the Nepotism? Have you made up something or even talk "hearsay"? # Occasionally yosileotwitter



Tonatiuh

Design Director Ka-Boom! Estudio SA de CV

Watch Rockman.exe Stream Online

Drugs, alcohol, and social activism

BRIEF COMMENTS ON DRUG AND ALCOHOL ADDICTION
By Fernando A. García - Buenos Aires, April 10, 2010 - original post here
Talk
regarding militancy for social change and personal change work.
Local human rebellion (The Community for Human Development), Buenos Aires, April 10, 2010.

drug addiction (1) and alcohol (2) is one of the forms of physical, psychological and moral states which are violent and dehumanizing system. This is incompatible with militancy for social change.
Drugs and alcohol are "weapons of war" that uses the dehumanizing system to stay in power. Addiction to drugs and alcohol is an integral part of the violence generated by this system.
On the one hand, the system feeds consumer expectations can only be met by a few, and then offers to drugs or alcohol as an escape to relieve the suffering generated by the frustration of unfulfilled expectations. And the occasional leak ends up being permanent lifestyle for many and suicide for others.
If not by way of binge drinking, the dehumanizing system chemically deactivated and rebellious impulse of the younger generation. The dialectic of rebellion and generational change is diverted to a barren road. What generational rebellion would arise and develop with militants whose time lag between the effects of the drug and the search for the next dose?!
dehumanizing system carried out a genocide to preserve and perpetuate generational. Ironically sometimes be associated with addiction to drugs and alcohol with a rebellion in the world of the establishment, when in fact serve their interests. It is paradoxical that alcohol is associated with success, popularity, fun, friendship, good sex and quality of life. Paradoxically, and suspicious.
And all this is not inconsistent with the suppression of drugs or alcohol, and dehumanizing system that schizophrenically moves on both fronts, as two sides of same coin. That is why the debate between liberalization or prohibition does not address the root the problem is violence inherent in the system.
militancy for social change through active nonviolence requires a clear mind, requires the best psycho-physical condition to carry out strength and permanence.

is known of the close relationship between drugs, guns, crime and war. Also between drugs, alcohol, health and disease. (3) (4) is not compatible want in a world that is freer and more humane, and associate this addiction to drugs and alcohol. Does not support universal human imagining the nation and fight for it to active nonviolence as our consciousness is taken over by the unruly streams of stimuli generated by drugs and alcohol. On the other hand, is not consistent denounce the system as if it is active accomplice. The latter is an ethical argument, not to be confused with a simple conventional moralizing. ***



Also in the context of our personal development work, addiction to drugs and alcohol is very harmful and is strongly discouraged. Some confuse this and wrongly assimilated the moral precepts based on authority, tradition or social custom prevailing. But in this context is not a moral issue, but practical. There is a practical basis it makes them incompatible personal development work with addiction to substances that alter brain chemistry strongly or impair somatic base on which to settle the operations of consciousness.
Our personal development work aimed at overcoming suffering, to discover and strengthen their sense of our lives, to achieve certain expertise regarding topics such as death and transcendence, the sense of what exists, and so on. Such work can be very demanding and require the best conditions to carry out psychophysical and vital bearing the consequences of their results. Psychological conditions are not separated from the physical, but which influence one another. Drugs and alcohol not only strongly modify the physical basis, but often deteriorate more or less irreversible.
Moreover, the action of such substances is beyond the control of the addict, and you can not control the change in brain chemistry that cause, nor control the operations that trigger mental and emotional. Conversely, our personal development work is based on the intentionality of consciousness and its expansion. Reversibility
lost consciousness, and the relationship with internal and external environments is complicated by losing intentionality and self-criticism, and freedom of choice. Strong impulses from the intrabody, driven by chemical, determine the work level of consciousness and its structure.
But apart from considering these consequences, it should be noted the psychological conditions that emerged and developed addiction. The suffering and nonsense are the condition in which recourse to drugs and alcohol, and growing as an addiction. The existential vacuum is intended to be filled with temporary senses with false false senses and exit doors. In this internal state is great confusion, and freedom of choice is very limited.
drug dependence and alcohol emerged and developed in a psychological context of "flight from conflict of situation. " They are a means to tackle and overcome conflicts (as is appropriate to our work), but to escape from them, to take "away" from them. The personal context is no internal force, but it decreased in retreat towards life.
The fact that some drugs are called "recreational" does not exempt of this. To say that some do not cause physical or psychological dependence is a misleading argument, because the dependency is not based solely on the chemical composition of the drug, but also the willingness to use them as a way of escape, and false start of the conflicts resolved.
Targeting our life based on a profound sense, we try to go tacking actions consistent with ourselves and with others. In this context, physical pleasure is a contingent factor that may or may not accompany the actions coherent, valid actions, to the internal drive. But in whom the drug and alcohol grow as dependency, pleasure is becoming the standard for accepting or rejecting options in a descending pathway that leads to more suffering and nonsense.
others would not also consider the medical aspects, the statistics on this subject, and individual and social consequences. ***



Ultimately, the inconsistency of the addiction to drugs and alcohol clear arise both in relation to personal development work as activism for social change through active nonviolence. Resistance to stop using drugs and alcohol show the degree of addiction is being subjected. Obviously, a superficial commitment to our issues requires little resignation (5) . Each according to their vital interests and the importance assigned to them, decide what to choose. And so will build its future.


NOTES TO FOOTER
1. More generally and without distinction, are psychotropic drugs (psychoactive) drugs, synthesis, design, narcotic analgesics, hallucinogens, psychostimulants, antidepressants, amphetamines, psychedelics, opiates, volatile, and so on. Dependence can be physical or psychological. It should also distinguish the type and degree of action, and that while snuff, caffeine, protein mateína and psychostimulants are in fact not have the psychological and social effects that concern us in these notes. Finally, we are interested here in particular the consumer is not bound to a therapeutic treatment occasional and limited in duration.
2. Alcohol is a psychoactive drug (depressant), but is quoted separately for better recognition, as their legal and consumer sales disguise their character as such.
3. Here there are those who equate drug dependence and alcohol consumption of snuff and caffeine. In the context of these notes, the normal use of snuff or coffee (or tea mate) is not a serious impediment to social activism and personal change. The snuff or caffeine consumption does not have the same gravity as the drug and alcohol dependence. under any of the aspects we consider in these notes.
4. On the other hand, if extremáramos the point of view with respect to the violence of our actions, nothing would be exempted from it: "2. Until the fully realized human being a human society, ie a society in which power is in the social whole and not a part of it (submitting and aiming to set), violence is the sign under which they perform all social activity. "The Human Landscape. IX. Violence. Humanize the Earth. Complete Works Volume I. Silo.
5. Anyone who plays sport at competition level, knows that drug and alcohol addiction is a serious impediment. It is a practical fact. Activism for social change and personal change work, if undertaken with a degree of commitment and depth, effectively exclude the addiction to drugs and alcohol for practical reasons such psychologically and physically.

---

Diego Rodriguez
diegohumanista@gmail.com
Published http://sinapsiserraticas.blogspot.com/

Pkd Latest Breakthroughs

complement ... the "Print" is more environmentally friendly.

sinning rifle, I play this interesting (and not so surprising) note on the Technology Green taken from Matuk.com:

"What is more" green "ink on paper or digital? Don Carli, Executive Vice President SustainComm World LLC and a senior researcher at the Institute communication for sustainable, gave an interesting interview where he puts into question the purported advantages of electronic books, digital ink on real paper counterpart.

Here are some of the most interesting passages of the interview:

" Apart from the factor 'be cool, one of the points of marketing in selling e-readers books is that they are greener than the print counterpart. Surprising that the common view of consumers, unaware of the stories behind this is to think that entering the digital world is more environmentally friendly and saves trees. Many wake up upset to learn that electronic reading is not as green as it was considered naively. "

" There is no doubt that print media can do a better job handling the sustainability of their supply chain and waste, but it is a wrong notion to assume that digital media are categorically organic. Computers, electróncios book readers, cell phones do not grow on trees and power requirements tend to be unsustainable. "

" Make a computer typically requires removing mine and refine dozens of minerals and metals, including gold, silver and palladium, as well as extensive use of plastics and hydrocarbon solvents. To function, digital devices require a constant flow of electrons mainly from burning coal, and at the end of the day, all these electronic systems are the largest toxic group created by man. Until recently, there was very little information, if it had, over the cycle Life digital media. "

" Sadly, the paper printing has been seen as inefficient, it generates a lot of waste and also destructive to the environment, without thinking that in fact a lot of printed material is comparatively more benign and also where there is much material recyclable. Also, printing on paper has an incredible potential to be a more sustainable than it currently is. Without doubting the importance of printed media in business, government and society, these have taken the role of the old devil in decline. Digital media has taken the role of being the bright young man who appears at dawn . "

" Ironically, the future of digital media and e-book readers, is based on flexible polymer electronics, which are manufactured using printing presses instead of manufacturing technology of silicon semiconductors. In fact, the next generation of digital readers will print and digital. "

The interview in this link. "

Legal Age To Drive Dirt Bike

Press. Karmafest

As you know, several weeks ago started Kuadradas Kronika site, a place for comics or webcomics" which publishes stories of several members of K!, plus a specified strip to criticize denunciar o incluso contestar sarcásticamente, ataques y comentarios mala leche, provenientes de los egos trastocados de muchos autodenominados enemigos nuestros.

La réplicas que nosotros realizamos, son tomadas muchas veces como "ataques", siendo que los "críticos" originales, buscan siempre burlarse o deformar nuestros dichos e ideas, pero al verse confrontados chillan cobardemente sintiendose hasta ofendidos y tachándonos de cualquier tipo de calificativo que se les antoje.

Nuevamente, vemos aparecer un pobre individuo, perturbado por sus traumas y envalentonado por el anonimado, abandonando su vida común, para vivir del odio que le impulsa a pasar el día, orbitando todas y cada una de las actividades and words of Ka-Boom!, all I can say is: Poor guy.

I leave this statement in this regard we have prepared in the study. Thank you very much to all our friends for their support.

"Dear Friends, Ka-Boom!, Karmatron and Kuadradas Kronika:
As a principle and philosophy of life we \u200b\u200bhave advocated for free to share our experiences and guide people who want to enter this through the comic, with the simple purpose of leaving a legacy and the hope that people do. This has led unit with many people who share the work together for a common benefit, but has also generated hatred and frustration on other people based on their ego, trying to discredit seek revenge over 20 years of constant struggle in their quest to destroy something that is built through hard work, professionalism and heart.

One can say that is one of our most ardent fans but focused literally to destruction, lives only for second to second what makes our study and has started a blog specifically to attack KronikasKuadradas registered the name. com which presents plagiarism, manipulation and misuse gives our logos and Oscar González Loyo, and makeup as demonstrating a low mocking evolution and moral quality.

Unfortunately there are "colleagues" who support this cheapness and share these attacks.

This call is to have knowledge, as for many years we've made aware of our steps in the middle of respect for you and consider them part of the family K! to share with you what is happening and there are no surprises if we continue to uphold and are criticized for it.

We are already taking action on the matter in a legal manner as such attitudes have exceeded the limits that violate copyright premise that for years has been a pillar of our struggle not only for ourselves but for the benefit of the Authors Guild. One thing is constructive criticism to our work and another thing is the personal attacks and threats, kidnappings and theft of intellectual property.

As a seal of our study and philosophy of life, we continue to work for you, fighting for the environment and doing what fills us in this life: to produce.

In our study we send our most sincere thanks to all those friends and family who have supported us and it will not only share in the struggle in various ways with moral support for our cause.

Ka-Boom! Estudio SA de CV "